>> EDA User News and Reviews
Thread views: 71592 View all threadsNext thread*

08/22/06 12:05 AM
Great Idea - But how feasible would it be Report this article as Inappropriate to us !!!Login to Reply

We were involved in a project for developing the TEST CASE generator. Over time we realised that using a generic code might not be the best answer to come up with an Automatic Test Case Generator- why?
Each foundry sends us the test cases described in the Design rule manual. These test cases are usually specific to particular foundries. For each of these foundries, unless its a simple rule like a width or spacing check, the test cases can be very different. Rather than using a generic code, we would be better off by building a database with different test cases collected from different foundries.
The generic code will however work perfectly for the RULE FILE GENERATOR.

Entire thread
SubjectPosted byPosted on
*Automatic Environment for DRC Rule File Development and QA  07/06/06 03:56 AM
.*Sometime this is to be startedRamesh.Nadamuni  09/07/06 11:53 PM
.*Great Idea - But how feasible would it beDave  08/22/06 12:05 AM
.*Good Concept - Reveals a huge gapMatt  08/05/06 04:10 PM
.*Address a true needTarek Badreldin  07/19/06 06:34 PM
.*Interesting article, but what is the means to it?Ahmed Yehia  07/10/06 01:51 PM
.*Good articleAiteen Zhang  07/09/06 04:58 AM
.*Good work but we need moreMohamed Ismail  07/06/06 03:56 AM
Jump to


DownStream: Solutions for Post Processing PCB Designs
Verific: SystemVerilog & VHDL Parsers

© 2020 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
25 North 14th Steet, Suite 710, San Jose, CA 95112
+1 (408) 882-6554 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
AECCafe - Architectural Design and Engineering TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes GISCafe - Geographical Information Services  MCADCafe - Mechanical Design and Engineering ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy PolicyAdvertise